Statement of Senator Scott Brown on nominations of James Miller and Katherine Tobin to USPS Board Of Governors
The Postal Service today is clearly at a crossroads. Every day that passes is another day that pushes the Postal Service closer to the brink of insolvency. Many have argued that this is simply a result of burdensome statutory obligations placed on the Postal Service at a time when the economic situation was much different than today. Others have pointed out that the Postal Service is simply being forced to face a new reality brought on by new technology and accelerated by the recession. Regardless which reason you favor, all can agree that some hard choices must be made to allow the Postal Service to continue to serve this country successfully in the future.
The fact remains that first class mail volume, the largest contributor to postal revenue, is on the decline and there is no rebound in sight. This has forced the Postal Service to find ways to right-size its delivery network and reduce capacity to meet current volume levels. This process must move forward in a responsible way that is sensitive to the needs of communities and small businesses and recognizes the valuable service of postal employees.
That said, the Postal Service can only do so much without some help from Congress. Lifting some of these legislative restrictions will give the Postal Service a substantial financial boost in the near term. That is why I, along with Senators Collins, Carper, and Lieberman worked hard to develop a comprehensive bipartisan reform bill and get it passed through the Senate this spring.
During the development of the bill, we talked to many different stakeholders and received valuable input from a number of important organizations with a long history of postal oversight, advocacy, and expertise. This included the Postal Service itself, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the Government Accountability Office, and all of the postal employee unions. Yet, from my recollection, we heard little from the Postal Board of Governors directly on most of the important issues being deliberated and discussed as part of the reform legislation.
This is concerning because of the important role that the Board of Governors plays in setting policy for the Postal Service and the oversight responsibilities it has in ensuring that those policies are implemented successfully.
It is clear from nominee interviews and questionnaires that there are many different viewpoints on the path forward for the Postal Service and the areas where statutory changes would help or hinder that process. Yet, the member’s of this committee and our staffs heard very little from the board over the last year that would have indicated those divergent views or how they might inform the proposals in the final bill.
Considering that both of the nominees being considered today are being reconfirmed in their position on the board, these are legitimate issues to raise. Speaking as the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee of jurisdiction over the Postal Service, I expected that the Board of Governors would have a larger role to play in helping to develop legislative policy that will have a far reaching affect on how the Postal Service will operate and find its financial footing in the future.
We are obviously waiting on the House of Representatives to consider their own postal reform bill in the very near future. There is universal agreement that the time for action is now. It is imperative that Congress pass a bill this year in order to get the Postal Service on a path to financial solvency and future long-term success. This is obviously no easy task. When the Senate considered our bill on the floor, there was plenty of debate on the right combination of solutions. The Postal Service impacts many important stakeholders and thoughtful consideration is required across many viewpoints. I am confident, however, that our bill included a set of proposals that will finally put the Postal Service on a sustainable fiscal path that will support employees, communities, and businesses alike.
There is no doubt that declining mail volumes will continue to place significant fiscal strain on the Postal Service in the future. The Postal Service must continue to adapt its business model to ensure both its financial survival and maintain the level of service so many Americans and businesses rely on. The Board of Governors has an important role in that process and I hope our nominees will continue to take that responsibility seriously and work with Congress in a more meaningful way in the future, should their nominations proceed.
Regardless, I want to thank our nominees and their friends and family for their service and for being here today. Thank you Mr. Chairman.
the bog is not imformed because they are political appointees and are not known for postal expertise. the important issue is the post office responsible for health care and pensions or the us treasurey. the responsibility lies with the treasurey and the senator should realize this.
congratulations is appropriate for the two members of the bog but lets get down to the point of saving the usps,
jackie
In the republican controlled house of representatives.republicans say,dont force us to to bring up legistation on postal reform until after the November election so we can get re-elected and continue to controll the way the voting goes in the house.Then we`ll gut the postal service and destroy delivery standards regardless of what the citizens of this country think.I URGE ALL CITISENS TO VOTE DEMOCRAT AND TELL THESE REPUBLICANS THAT THEY CAN`
In the republican controlled house of representatives.republicans say,dont force us to to bring up legistation on postal reform until after the November election so we can get re-elected and continue to controll the way the voting goes in the house.Then we`ll gut the postal service and destroy delivery standards regardless of what the citizens of this country think.I URGE ALL CITISENS TO VOTE DEMOCRAT AND TELL THESE REPUBLICANS THAT THEY CAN
C P you need prejudice management.
I see the USELESS WHINING of the one who calls himself “God Damn APWU” once again.
The man has no concept of how this thing is playing out….
The man seems to think that if you call all those people on his “LIST”, that HE WILL GET WHAT HE WANTS SO BADLY…..
It won’t happen….
I might ask him just one question….
WHY DIDN’T YOU TAKE THE LAST OFFER ???
Princella Vogel
Southern Region Coordinator
15055 Woodham Dr., S. 100
Houston, TX 77073-6024
(281) 821-9000
(281) 821-9028 (FAX)
(281) 447-5378 (TDD)
Omar M. Gonzalez
Western Region Coordinator
1350 Old Bayshore Hwy.
Suite 360
Burlingame, CA 94010
(650) 685-7402
(650) 685-7429 (FAX)
(650) 685-7429 (TDD)
DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS
Myke Reid
Director
Legislative & Political Department
(202) 842-4210
(202) 682-2528 (FAX)
Martha Shunn-King
Director
Organization Department
(202) 842-4227
(202) 216-2634 (FAX)
Joyce B. Robinson
Director
Research and Education Department
(202) 842-4225
(202) 216-2606 (FAX)
William J. Kaczor
Director
APWU Health Plan
799 Cromwell Park Drive
Suites K-Z
Glen Burnie, MD 21061
410-424-1503
410-424-1589 (FAX)
Sue Carney
Director
Human Relations Department
(202) 842-4270
(202) 216-2634 (FAX)
Judy Beard
Director
Retirees Department
(202) 842-8584
(202) 682-2528 (FAX)
RESIDENT OFFICERS
LEGISLATIVE AND POLITICAL DEPT.
202) 842-4210
(202) 682-2528 (FAX)
Tom Maier
Assistant Director
APWU NATIONAL EXECUTIVE BOARD
Cliff Guffey
President
(202) 842-4250
(202) 842-4297 (FAX)
Greg Bell
Executive Vice President
(202) 842-4250
(202) 842-4297 (FAX)
Elizabeth Powell
Secretary-Treasurer
(202) 842-4215
(202) 842-8530 (FAX)
Mike Morris
Director
Industrial Relations
(202) 842-4273
(202) 371-0992 (FAX)
Rob Strunk
Director
Clerk Division
(202) 842-4220
(202) 842-8517 (FAX)
Mike Gallagher
Eastern Region Coordinator
1401 Liberty Place
Sicklerville, NJ 08081
856-740-0633
(856) 740-0742 (FAX)
(856) 740-0715 (TDD)
John H. Dirzius
Northeast Region Coordinator
5 N. Village Ave., Suite 3
Rockville Centre, NY 11570
(516) 678-1327
(516) 766-0967 (FAX)
(516) 678-1813 (TDD)
Insolvency has no meaning to politicans as they fear loosing votes.
BOG should be dissolved as from an economic business sense they are lacking any business decision. Congress primary function regarding USPS is naming Post Offices. Eliminating wasted expense with revenue decreasing is beyond their
economic scope. Eliminating, closing non needed suburban post offices resulting from changing demographics is a political no-no as certain postal union and management groups exert pressure on headquarters management and political groups. 6 day delivery is a waste in the 21st century due to advanced technology in communications. The USPS is a past need from the 20th century. USPS provided services exceed demand resulting in declining revenue and increase cost.
The American public could care less as to reducing delivery to 5 days. They question as to why it has not been done.