and Employees Misused Travel Credit Cards
The USPS Office Of Inspector General released the following report:
Postal Service employees did not comply with prescribed travel policies resulting in over $600,000 in excessive travel costs for lodging and airfare in FYs 2009 and 2010. We estimate the Postal Service could realize an additional $600,000 in savings over the next 2 years, or $300,000 annually, if it takes action to curtail employee noncompliance with travel policies. Further, the Postal Service did not cancel 2,491 credit cards issued to former employees, including 53 employees listed as deceased in employee records. At the time of our audit, there was more than $37 million in open credit associated with cards of former employees.
Employees Exceeded Government Lodging Rates
Postal Service employees continued to exceed the prevailing government lodging rates. The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (OIG) also reported this
issue in FY 2009. Of the 155,104 lodging transactions we reviewed, 21,691 exceeded the government lodging rate. Postal Service policy requires travelers to obtain the
government rate for official lodging. While the Postal Service is in the process of clarifying this requirement in their policy, our audit found that employees were frequently
unaware of the established government rate when they obtained lodging and did not verify whether the rate they secured exceeded the government rate. In addition, the current Electronic Travel Voucher System (eTravel) does not flag lodging that exceeds the prevailing government rate and does not require employees to separate lodging amounts from taxes, resulting in lodging rates that are not transparent to reviewing officials. Overall, we noted that from October 2008 through September 2010, the Postal Service could have saved more than $600,000 if employees adhered to prescribed government lodging rates and could save an additional $600,000 over the
next 2 years if action is taken.
We reviewed travel card usage for 2747 employees with high-risk transactions and found that 173 misused their government travel card by purchasing personal items and
taking cash advances unrelated to official travel. While travel coordinators reviewed cardholder statements when delinquencies were identified, they did not routinely review for misuse if there was no associated delinquency. As a result, we identified more than $349,317 in inappropriate purchases and cash advances from October 2008 through September 2010. We referred this employee misconduct to the OIG Office of Investigations, and Postal Service and cognizant officials have taken a variety of personnel actions including employee removal.
When employees misuse their government travel cards, there is an increased risk of delinquency and write-offs, which could negatively impact the Postal Service’s
contractual relationship with Citibank® (goodwill). Further, the amount of money rebated to the Postal Service is reduced when Citibank forgives delinquent accounts.
Based on our audit work, Postal Service officials are mitigating risk by lowering employee credit limits from the current level of $15,000. In addition, the Postal Service
will require employees with government travel cards to sign cardholder agreements to verify employees are aware travel cards are for official travel only.
Travel Cards Were Not Cancelled for Separated Employees
The Postal Service did not cancel 2,491 credit cards issued to former employees, including 53 employees listed as deceased in employee records. We identified two former employees who were using their travel cards after they separated from the Postal Service. Postal Service policy requires an employee’s supervisor to collect an employee’s travel card upon termination. However, no processes exist to verify that credit card accounts for separated employees have been cancelled. At the time of our audit, there was more than $37 million in open credit associated with these cards. When we brought this issue to management’s attention, they took immediate action to begin closing the accounts of the separated employees we identified.
Miscellaneous Travel Policy Noncompliance
Employees violated various other travel policies including paying for other employees’ lodging, using their personal credit card for travel rather than their government travel
card, submitting duplicate claims for travel reimbursement, and other noncompliance described in Appendix B. The eTravel system does not flag or otherwise identify the
noncompliances we identified. As a result, the Postal Service has an increased risk of unnecessary travel expenses.
Travelers Submitted International Airfare Costs Before Travel
We noted in isolated instances that employees submitted travel vouchers for international airfare that was booked for future dates. Postal Service policy explicitiy
prohibits payment in advance of travel. Postal Service officials advised that the employees would not have had sufficient credit on their travel cards if the airfare was
not paid in advance, and such flights were routinely booked far in advance, thus requiring prompt payment before travel. As a result, the Postal Service is at increased
risk for overpayment, as it did with one employee who received a reimbursement of $10,114 in October 2009 for a flight that was never taken. The employee currently has a
credit on his government travel card account and has yet to repay the Postal Service. The Postal Service increases its risk of not collecting the overpayment the longer it
resides in the employee’s account.
Employees Exceeded Government Lodging Rates
Postal Service employees continued to pay for lodging that exceeded the prevailing government lodging rates, as previously reported by the OIG in FY 2009.Postal Service policy requires travelers to obtain the government rate for official lodging. Of the 155,104 lodging transactions made from October 1, 2008, through August 13, 2010, we reviewed, 21,691 exceeded the government lodging rate. While the Postal Service will clarify this requirement in a revised Handbook F-15, our audit found employees were frequently unaware of what the established government rate was when they obtained lodging and did not verify whether the rate they secured exceeded the government rate. Some of the occurrences we noted included:
• One employee claimed 326 lodging nights for reimbursement over a 20-month period that, in total, exceeded the prescribed government lodging rates by $17,877.
• Postal Service employees claimed lodging charges for reimbursement for the 2009 and 2010 National Postal Forums that exceeded the prescribed government lodging rates by $88,983.
• Two employees on an extended detail assignment for the majority of FY 2009 charged a total of $11,000 over the prescribed government lodging rates.
Employees Misused Travel Credit Cards
We reviewed travel card usage for 27415 employees with high-risk transactions and found that 173 misused their government travel cards by purchasing items for personal
use and taking cash advances unrelated to official travel, including the following:
- Three employees purchased airfare tickets, including tickets to Spain and Italy, for family and friends.
- One employee purchased an Apple computer and paid his mortgage.
- One employee used his government issued travel card more than 50 times at adult entertainment establishments.
204b, my response was to person who signed their name as Gee. If you actually are a 204b and god help us if you are, you represent the cluelessness of a large percentage of management. You should be promoted, for being an inquisitive idiot.
Priceless!
Hell wich yu fool!
Gee, I’m not buying your argument. All companies warn employees about co-mingling funds on credit cards. Three , four months after the fact it hard to remember what that tank of gas, meal, or hotel room with the secretary was for. If would be analogous for me as a clerk to borrow a Newsweek or Time magazine, and say I’m going to bring it back tomorrow. Use your own damn credit cards for your own personal expenses,fool.
Disgraceful 1 1 1
Pure and simple theft in the majority, yet there are no firings or prosecutions, why?
As Maryanne Gibbons, Chief Legal Counsel for the entire Postal Service. said; there are two sets of rules, one for employees and one for management. Judging by managements reaction to all the malfeasance and outright thievery that is apparently being condoned from the new Postmaster General; Ms Gibbons is correct.
Just the fact that the organizational responsibility for ehtics enforcement has been removed from her office, and, the fact that she still has a job, says a lot about the “two tier” legal system that upper management allows to exist.
The Postal Service runs without any framework for accountability and their management seems to encourage that philosophy.
It is time for the new Postmaster General to step up and “re-align” Postal Service management or consider resigning. Dishonesty and theft cannot be tolerated.
Another jab from the oig. Fact is each person is responsible for what they charged. The inapropriate charges were just that, charges for personel convienience, not re-embursed by the postal service.
If the charges are not paid the holder of the card not the USPS is gone after
I still gots mine!!
that reminds me. what did I do with the dozen credit cards that I had in my possession before I retired? I think the Mrs. has them.and she just went shopping.
I say, lets blame it all on the 53 dead guys!
And this study cost how much? Are the guilty parties being charged criminally? No, of course not, so why even bother?
And you want to raise rates from what – to – WHAT?
Dumb ass OIG they keep saying “employees” Why in the hell don’t they say management? Management and Maintenance employees are the only ones with credit cards and most maintenance employees say no to them. Call it like it is! BYE BYE to the 7500 F!@# nuts a Riff couldn’t have happened to a more deserving group of ???!